U.K. Student on Trial for the First 3D Camcorder Piracy Case

Ciprian Florea, a 28-year-old film technology student in the U.K., is being accused of creating a camera that can record 3D movies and intending to record the movie Gravity. The device comprised of two high-definition camcorders placed in a custom-made box that recorded with the necessities of creating the left and right eye effect for 3D images. Movies have been "bootlegged" since cameras could be snuck into theaters; however, this is the first case where a person has allegedly attempted to record a 3D production. Florea's defense is that he brought the camera in but had no intention of using it to film Gravity.

Florea, a student of film technology at Birmingham City University, is said to have hired two special high-definition cameras the day before his arrest. These had been placed in a custom-made box in order to record the left and right eye as required for 3D imaging. 

With no specific “camming” legislation available to the prosecution, Florea stands accused of possessing a 3D camera with intent to commit fraud, i.e the recording and subsequent distribution of the movie.

It's fascinating to be around during a time when technology is developing faster than the media can keep up with it. After researching piracy for several weeks now, I have read about people and organizations accused of various different forms of piracy (see the nine types) and the repercussions for those actions; I have also read and watched several critiques of the film industry and its reactions to these pirates, and it is quite clear that the industry can't get the legislatures to keep up with the increasing abilities of consumers. It seems much more reactive than proactive. After all, the U.K. didn't even have a simple way to charge Florea.

Source:
A. (2015, January 6). First 3D camcorder piracy case: student on trial | TorrentFreak. Retrieved from http://torrentfreak.com/first-3d-camcorder-piracy-case-student-on-trial-150106/

PIPCU Arrests Two Men Suspected of Stealing and Uploading The Expendables 3

A high-quality copy of The Expendables 3 became available online on July 25, despite the U.S. premiere set for August 15, according the BBC. The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU), the U.K.'s anti-piracy police, have arrested two men, aged 36 and 33, for stealing the film from Lionsgate Films' cloud-based system and subsequently uploading it to the Internet. The company claimed spread of the copy cost them millions just in the U.K. This case is viewed as "a litmus test for measuring the impact of piracy," considering the film was short about $10 million, according to the projected earnings.

Head of Pipcu, Det Ch Insp Danny Medlycott said of the action: "Today's operation shows you the significant impact intellectual property crime has on our creative industries, with millions of pounds being lost as a result of criminal actions.

Research in 2011 from Carnegie Mellon University suggested that when a film is pirated prior to its release it loses up to 20% of its potential revenue. 

It is astounding how much revenue The Expendables 3 theoretically lost, especially when looking at X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which seemed to be unaffected by the release of its unfinished copy. The weird part about the situation is that these two men in their mid-30s who live in separate parts of the U.K. hacked into Lionsgate Films' cloud and stole the entire, completed film and then released it onto the Internet, free of charge. Despite the unusual circumstances of the arrested couple, PIPCU seems to be doing well since it received £3 million from the Intellectual Property Office to fund itself until 2017.

Source:

BBC News - Suspects behind Expendables 3 leak arrested in UK. (2014, November 25). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30192568

Piracy in the U.K.: Harming More Than Those on Top

The Guardian's article, "Movie piracy: threat to the future of films intensifies," discusses the ramifications of piracy in the film industry, particularly with independent films. When people pirate films (which 30 percent of the U.K. population does, according to Ipsos), they reduce the profits of the films; however, this does not harm the income of the big executives, as most people think. The minimal profits of indie films means buyers are less likely to take risks on such films. This not only means less support to independent film makers but also means production companies will put out more sequels and films that follow the same format, thus creating a more boring or repetitive film industry, and this also applies to television shows. The other large, negative effect of piracy is on the people in the credits at the end of a production, such as makeup artists and costume designers. Also, the websites people download/stream from as well as the producers of counterfeit DVDs are making profits, which can be traced to organized crime rings.

"Distributors are not able to take the risks they used to. What this means to the consumer is not that some producers don't get rich, it means the product doesn't get made," [head of the Independent Film and Television Alliance Jean Prewitt says.]

"One may think an individual act of piracy doesn't matter, but if that becomes a way of life then the value of intellectual property becomes eroded, shows like Downton Abbey won't get made," [executive producer of Downton Abbey Gareth Neame says.]

"The audiovisual industry supports hundreds of thousands of people's livelihoods and if the industry has trouble supporting itself, it's going to put people out of work," [managing director of eOne Films UK Alex Hamilton] says.

This article proposes ramifications of piracy that I had not considered previously, namely the ideas that independent films will go un-produced and the risks posed to more "bottom of the totem pole" positions. Considering how repetitive productions have been getting recently, we are in need of indies now more than ever; just look at how successful 12 Years a Slave and The Wolf of Wall Street were. Also, the film industry is enormous, so when it starts cutting jobs, that effect can be felt across the nation. However, the industry itself can take action against piracy, more than just sending out letters, as the article proposed. Downton Abbey, for example, premiered in the U.K. in September but doesn't premiere in the U.S. until January. American fans who don't care about pirating have been keeping up-to-date on the episodes and probably won't re-watch them in January. So not only is pirating of the show rampant in the U.S. but also the ratings will be lower when it is legally released because many watchers will have seen it already. And this phenomenon is not unique to this show; it occurs when any production (even in the music industry) is released at different times to different nations. This is not to excuse piracy, but it is a side of it the article neglected to discuss.

Source:
Lodderhose, D. (2014, July 17). Movie piracy: threat to the future of films intensifies | Film | The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jul/17/digital-piracy-film-online-counterfeit-dvds